Which form of automobile insurance is NOT correct?

The assertion regarding 100% Fault Insurance Plans is indeed not correct in the context of automobile insurance options commonly available in Manitoba. In the realm of automobile insurance, fault is typically a shared determination and does not correspond to an insurance plan where one party is held entirely responsible for every incident. This understanding aligns with the principles of collective liability and coverage practices, especially in systems like Manitoba's, where no-fault insurance plays a significant role.

In contrast, private insurers, compulsory government insurance plans, and no-fault insurance plans are all recognized structures within the province's regulatory framework for auto insurance. Private insurers offer a variety of coverage options that may go beyond basic requirements, while compulsory government insurance ensures that all drivers have a minimum level of protection. No-fault insurance plans, which are a hallmark of Manitoba’s system, allow for claims to be settled without determining fault, streamlining the process for individuals involved in accidents. Therefore, while the other forms accurately reflect available insurance mechanisms, a 100% fault insurance plan does not fit within the established types of automobile insurance in Manitoba.